MENU
dutch_stonewall_cover

Review: The Stonewall Dutch: a fighting repertoire against 1.d4, by Erwin L’Ami

By Davide Nastasio

Foreword: I realized this review has become more similar to a theoretical article. The reason is simple: If one is serious about playing the Stonewall Dutch, he or she must consider the homework which comes with learning this quite interesting opening. The fact that the Dutch is employed routinely by the top players in the world shows how such an opening is still alive and dangerous for those who are unprepared! L’Ami is quite honest in his positional evaluations and recommendations. However, be ready for a bumpy ride!

The Dutch is the first opening I learned against 1.d4, always thanks to a Chessbase DVD, The Dutch Stonewall, written a few years ago by IM Valeri Lilov.

 

dutch_lilov_cover

 

For those who don’t know the Dutch Stonewall at all, L’Ami in the intro video shows the pawn structure which arises after the moves: 1.d4,f5; 2.g3,Nf6; 3.Bg2,e6; 4.c4,d5; 5.Nf3,c6; 6.0-0,Bd6;

 

stonewall_formation

 

 

In Lilov’s DVD, the main classical hero of the Stonewall was Botvinnik, which we can see at work in the following games:

 

 

 

 

Unfortunately, my experience in tournaments using the Dutch against veteran players didn’t go so well. So I began my via crucis in order to find something else against 1.d4.

I studied the Slav by Pert,

 

solid_slav

 

and the triangle setup by Krasenkow,

 

 

traingle_setup

 

Again, things didn’t go well tournament-wise.  I’m not blaming the authors of those DVDs; on the contrary, they did a great job.  On one side I had to mature as player because I didn’t study the opening correctly, and on the other side maybe there was too much material for an amateur like me to really absorb, especially the Slav, which is really no joke!

So why am I returning to my first love? Lately I began to play 1.d4, and I realized that strangely the opening I had most problems against as White was the Dutch Stonewall.  If a player 300 points below me was able to draw against me using the Stonewall, it made me think. I merely considered the experience to be bad luck. Then when this new DVD by GM L’Ami came out, I felt the need to learn the Stonewall again, and see if now it would give me better results. An interesting fact is that L’Ami also had my experience when playing as White against the Stonewall, and for this reason he conducted a thorough investigation into this opening.  While working on it, he found even more ways Black could make White’s life difficult, and he shares some of his findings in the DVD. This is one of L’Ami’s games against the Stonewall.

 

 

 

In the introduction, L’Ami says that the Dutch Stonewall has been used by Carlsen (to beat Caruana) and Anand. That made me quite curious, because before watching the games I thought Anand perhaps had lost because he is an older player (most people don’t understand that Chess is a sport, and age definitely makes a difference!), but Caruana is definitely on the top and young, so age cannot be the factor for the loss. Here are the games:

Please pay attention to what could be considered a strange move played by Anand: 16.Nxd7; he gave up a good knight on the good outpost E5, for the bad bishop of the French and in this case the Dutch. I wish my opponents would be so caring and considerate when I play!
Jokes aside, we cannot imagine that a former world champion would make a mistake or doesn’t know what a bad bishop is. Instead, if we want to win more games, we need to ask ourselves what are the reasons behind that move. If I had to guess, I’d say that the bishop is the defender of the light squares; if White traded such a strong knight for the bishop, then the next goal White could have will be an exploitation of the light-squares weakness. Since the result of the game was bad for White, I guess Anand wasn’t able to carry out such a plan successfully, but the next player could be, so we must always be prepared. Especially today when someone (thanks to a silicon friend) could overcome the obstacles Anand found over the board.

 

 

 

In two other Chessbase DVDs, two great teachers, Tiviakov and Sagar Shah, were advising us to learn from the Classics. Such valuable and important advice is clearly valid in this case.  Likely Anand, one of the greatest world champions with a special memory, could have remembered unconsciously the idea of taking the Bd7 from the following game:

 

 

 

Now if taking the Bd7 is not the real mistake which made him lose the game, then we do need to analyze again and understand why Anand lost, but this goes beyond the scope of this review.  Still it is a good hint one should follow if interested in playing for or against the Stonewall Dutch!

The other game mentioned was against Caruana. This one is also quite interesting:

 

 

 

Returning to the review of the DVD, L’Ami makes it clear right away that he will focus on teaching the development of the dark squares bishop in D6. Like he correctly mentions, in Botvinnik’s time the bishop was developed in E7.

 

modern_development

 

But why was I attracted to the Dutch in the first place? The idea is simple, and connected to what I wrote before: I’m an amateur, not a professional.  My time for learning chess is limited, and I do accept the notion that in order to improve we should dedicate less time to learn the openings and more time to middlegame and endgames. So I try to learn openings where the “ideas” are more important than the correct move order or where it is not essential to memorize the first 25 moves precisely, as in the Sicilian Najdorf!

The DVD begins with 6 videos of typical maneuvers and typical ideas. This is done to prove that the Dutch Stonewall is not an opening that one needs to memorize a sequence of moves, but just needs to understand what to do, when, and why.  Then L’Ami begins a theoretical section; however, there is a lack of coverage of some lines that every Dutch defense player should know.

GM Williams, likely the biggest theoretical expert on the Dutch with many books written on it at his credit, generally advises to play 1.d4,e6;

 

1_d4_e6

 

Why? Because he is also a French Defense expert, so if White doesn’t want to enter the Dutch with 2.c4, he is quite happy to play the French. But what if White is quite well versed in some deviations like 2.Bg5

 

2_Bg5

 

 

or 2.Nc3?

 

2_Nc3

 

And what about the Staunton Gambit? 1.d4,f5; 2.e4

 

staunton_gambit

 

Notice also L’Ami lost a game against this line,

 

 

Of course one can also win in great style against the Staunton Gambit.  The idea I’m conveying is that one just needs to study it and practice it a little to be sure that if it happens in a tournament game there will be no surprises!

 

 

What about other deviations which are really dangerous, like 1.d4,f5; 2.h3

 

dutch_2_h3

 

Some players mistakenly think moves like Ph2-h3 are just waiting moves.  They are wrong.
Look what happens in the following game. Black could resign by move 6, and he is a player rated around 2000.

 

 

Another dangerous line is 1.d4,f5; 2.g4

 

Dutch_2_g4

 

L’Ami being a GM is very likely able to find the right way to refute these sidelines; nevertheless, since I was a Dutch player in the beginning, I did study them to avoid surprises in tournament games.  It was difficult to handle them in blitz and rapid games, however.  Hence the definite need to address them in a DVD if the opening moves are 1.d4,f5.

While working on the DVD and the model games I found other possible sidelines not treated, for example:
1.d4,e6; 2.c4,f5; 3.Nf3,Nf6; 4.g3,d5; now instead of 5.Bg2, at club-amateur level a move like: 5.cxd5 can be quite common.  How should Black deal against it?

 

5_cxd5

 

Should Black take with the pawn or the knight? In the 50 model games, such a line is not treated. This question is important, because taking with the pawn would change the game. Black wouldn’t have a backward weak pawn in E6 anymore.  At the same time, out of 7 million games I have in my reference database, only 43 have been played with such a line. But was it played mainly by low-level amateurs? No, as in the following game where White is rated 2490!

 

 

This is all part of the homework one should diligently do. The GM teaching us the opening cannot really cover all the possibilities, furthermore that would create a vacuum in our brains! We do need to learn how to study an opening, and how to keep our openings updated. This is the reason why the Chessbase system is nearly unbeatable for imparting to us chess knowledge. As we can see from the above example, I found in Megabase 2017 43 games on a line GM L’Ami didn’t consider, and I studied how I should play in such a circumstance.   Of course I’ll lose some games for whatever reason, but from my side I’ve done the best I could do with the time I have for studying chess!

On the other hand, I must say I was impressed by the fact that L’Ami addressed the book of the great GM Boris Avrukh and gave a line to neutralize what GM Avrukh offered in the book as line against the Dutch Stonewall. Obviously, I don’t want to say more because I know a lot of people read my reviews… and it wouldn’t be fair toward L’Ami who researched the opening so thoroughly.

The reader of the review could ask me why we need this DVD to learn the Dutch Stonewall if L’Ami didn’t really cover every possible line? My answer is the following: we need L’Ami because he has GM-level understanding. He is able to see the entire picture of the evolution of the opening and how it is played today, and can convey that to us like a modern art critic would be able to tell us everything behind a masterpiece hung in a museum. This doesn’t mean we must NOT consult other sources or do our own homework. It just means that the great part of the work — 70-80% — has been done for us through this DVD, and we do need to put effort for the remaining 20%, which are some of the sidelines I’ve pointed out above. There is also another important point: today we play many more games than in the past. The average GM has more than 2000 games at his active.  Just 40 to 50 years ago, the top GMs had maybe 700-1000 games throughout their careers. Now we have that amount just before becoming titled players, and then 2 times as much in all possible different time controls. This means we clearly need to vary our opening repertoire, both for keeping our opponents in the dark, but most of all for growing as chess players. This is the real reason why we need to add this DVD to our chess libraries, because we want to grow as players. I found the beginning videos about the maneuvers and typical ideas extremely informative, and they gave me the gist of ideas I had to commit to memory. Then when I began to watch the latest games on ECO from A85 to A90, I was already able to spot White’s and Black’s ideas behind their moves, and how correct or incorrect they were, thanks to L’Ami’s well-structured videos!

Now, for a detailed review of what we find inside the DVD: the first 6 videos are typical ideas and maneuvers.  They are a MUST watch because L’Ami outlines clearly, like a great professor, the state of knowledge White and Black have upon this opening, and what works and what doesn’t!

Then there are 6 videos on the following sequence:  1.d4,f5; 2.g3,Nf6; 3.Bg2,e6; 4.c4.d5; 5.Nf3,c6; 6.0-0.Bd6;

 

main_line_6_Bd6

 

L’Ami also did an exceptional job in choosing the games to teach us about this opening. The comments were great in focusing on the information we need to play the opening, like typical pawn breaks which happen in the above-mentioned sequence of moves:

 

typical_pawn_breaks

 

Notice how in Chessbase 14 a small diagram comes out at the right moment to capture our attention and makes us focus on something which happens every time we have that pawn structure!

 

chessbase14

 

Then it follows with 4 videos on the following sequence:  1.d4,f5; 2.g2,Nf6; 3.Bg2,e6; 4.c4,d5; 5.Nf3Bd6;

 

line_5_Nf3_Bd6

 

Three videos are dedicated to transposition lines with Nh3, as after: 1.d4,f5; 2.g3,Nf6; 3.Bg2,e6; 4.Nh3,

 

line_4_Nh3

 

L’Ami dedicates a video just to move order tricks, like those coming out from 1.d4,f5; 2.Nf3,d5;

 

early_moveorders

 

He clearly explains what the move order should be and why, and what he considers a mistake. This is the reason why we need a DVD with a GM explaining how to fine-tune our move order, because he brings us to a level of understanding we wouldn’t reach on our own.
The last 3 videos are dedicated to sidelines, and the last video is a theoretical overview.

There are 4 videos which are dedicated to interactive training where the teacher shows us a position or an entire game, and he asks questions to check if we understood the material through finding the right move or plan. These last 4 videos are quite important, in my opinion.  One should watch them before a tournament to see what he remembers and what he misses of the material. The DVD comes with a database of 50 model games.

The running time of the DVD is approximately 5 hours and 25 minutes. Clearly a lot of value for the small price we pay. My feelings for this DVD are quite positive because I really felt the depth of the preparation that L’Ami has. In every video he shows how deep his grasp is of where the pieces should be, and the reasons behind it. I really felt he studied deeply the games that he provides as examples, and he found every microscopic flaw to eventually play against Black or exploit it against White. He must be a monster to play against on the board.   I wish he would make some DVDs with a collection of his games, because he is a great teacher to learn from.

Post Scriptum:
On video 22, the one dedicated to 1.Nf3, L’Ami clearly states that one cannot really enter the Stonewall if White knows what Black is doing. Such stubbornness in using the Stonewall at all costs could be quite detrimental, and he says one needs to have something else ready. Since I want to have a complete repertoire, and I guess everyone reading this wants it too, I’d like to suggest the DVD by GM Michal Krasenkow: The Triangle Stup: A complete defense against 1.d4.

 

traingle_setup

 

In that DVD, Krasenkow treats the Stonewall, but he also gives a Semi-Slav repertoire which can work well against 1.Nf3, and covers all the possibilities for Black.

In the spirit of doing one’s own homework, on the video 21, L’Ami gives a move Bb4, which for him is similar to the Nimzo-Indian, while for me is more similar to the Classical Dutch. Hence, if one is serious about the Dutch, the masterwork written by GM Williams is a must-read because it will give a broader perspective on how to play in many different situations.

 

the_killer_dutch

 

Please don’t expect one DVD or one book, no matter how excellent and professional they are, to form your chess persona.  One needs to be exposed to different authors and ideas in order to have a good understanding of the subject. But most of all, a player must be an active learner, asking difficult questions, and ready to pursue the often elusive answer. Good luck in your Dutch games!

 

Related Posts

Leave a Reply